{"id":4015,"date":"2026-07-31T04:35:41","date_gmt":"2026-07-31T04:35:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hometransferguide.com\/?p=4015"},"modified":"2026-07-31T04:35:41","modified_gmt":"2026-07-31T04:35:41","slug":"heres-what-we-know-about-key-questions-fauci-refused-to-answer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hometransferguide.com\/?p=4015","title":{"rendered":"Here\u2019s What We Know About Key Questions Fauci Refused To Answer"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
<\/p>\n
\n

Anthony Fauci stonewalled questions from Sen. Rand Paul at a highly-anticipated congressional hearing on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

Read more Colorado Suffers Setback In Fight To Defend Gun Tax<\/a><\/p>\n

But Paul has released an avalanche of new documents related to his investigation. That trove, plus documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and a separate investigation in the House, shed light on Paul\u2019s questions. <\/p>\n

Though Fauci refused to reply, some of Paul\u2019s questions during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing can be answered from Fauci\u2019s own writing and other evidence.<\/p>\n

Fauci did not reply to a request for comment.<\/p>\n

Did Fauci And His Inner Circle Say Different Things Publicly And Privately?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Paul: \u201cFor years Anthony Fauci has been the public face saying this has come from nature. It\u2019s the marketplace, it\u2019s the marketplace, it\u2019s the marketplace. \u2026 But what we find is that what he was saying in public is different than what he was saying in private.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Fauci and the virologists in his inner circle all privately wrestled with scientific evidence contradicting the idea COVID had originated from a Wuhan wet market, even as they gave the public the impression they were certain it had emerged there.(RELATED: The Fauci Files: Five Explosive Findings Declassified By Tulsi Gabbard)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Fauci by late January 2020 that the wet market was not the pandemic\u2019s source, but a superspreader event.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe first infection was in early December and was not connected to the market,\u201d Fauci wrote of the wet market outbreak that began in late December 2019.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Fauci was also in communication with China CDC Director George Gao. Gao had cried about the revelation that the wet market was not the pandemic\u2019s source on the phone with his American counterpart, CDC Director Bob Redfield. <\/p>\n

\u201cGeorge was very sensitive and understandably defensive since he was the one who said early on that there was no human to human transmission and that the original 27 cases in the wet market reported on December 31, 2019 were animal to human when actually human to human transmission was occurring weeks before,\u201d Fauci said in his diary on Feb. 3, 2020. \u201cHaving said that, somewhere the virus jumped from animals to humans.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gao would go on to state this publicly. Fauci never did. <\/p>\n

Paul contrasted Fauci\u2019s early private doubts about the Wuhan wet market being the pandemic\u2019s origin with his repeated emphasis on wet markets in press interviews. He played a compilation of Fauci talking about the risks of wet markets on cable television. (RELATED: CIA Collected Explosive Signals Intelligence On Wuhan Lab, Fauci\u2019s Diary Reveals)<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cIt just boggles my mind that how when we have so many diseases that emanate out of that unusual human-animal interface that we don\u2019t just shut [wildlife markets] down,\u201d Fauci said on Fox News in April 2020.<\/p>\n

Fauci repeatedly steered the press, the scientific community, and the U.S. intelligence community to his handpicked clique of virologists. He championed their work when they identified the wet market as the virus\u2019s origin. <\/p>\n

Read more Former UFC Star Anthony Smith Accused Of Trying To Run Wife Over With Car<\/a><\/p>\n